API Integration · Automation Engineering

API integration where the off-the-shelf connectors run out of room.

Sometimes the right answer isn't another Zap.

When volume, precision, or the event shape exceeds what off-the-shelf integration can handle, the answer is a custom integration built like infrastructure: idempotent, monitored, retry-safe, and documented.

Discuss the engagement

When you need a custom API integration

Most integration problems are best solved with native connectors, iPaaS middleware, or Zapier. Custom API integration is the answer when none of the off-the-shelf options handle the requirement: typically high event volume, low-latency requirements, complex transformation logic, or event shapes the SaaS connectors don't model.

The other reason for custom integration is cost trajectory. Some Zapier or iPaaS tasks scale with volume in ways that become expensive faster than expected. Replacing the right ones with a custom integration brings the unit economics back to predictable.

We build these in the language and runtime that fits the team supporting them: Node.js, Python, or serverless platforms (AWS Lambda, Cloud Functions, Cloudflare Workers). The choice is governed by where the operational burden will sit.

How we build custom API integrations

Every custom integration we ship has these properties.

  1. 1
    Idempotent
    Replaying the same event produces the same result. Critical for retry safety.
  2. 2
    Queued
    Inbound events land in a queue, not directly into the destination system. Decouples ingestion from processing.
  3. 3
    Rate-limit aware
    Respects the destination API's rate limits, with backoff and queue management.
  4. 4
    Monitored
    Alerting on failure rate, queue depth, and latency. The integration tells you when it's degrading.
  5. 5
    Documented
    Schema, transformation logic, error semantics, and operational runbook. The integration outlasts whoever built it.
  6. 6
    Versioned
    Schema changes are managed deliberately rather than accumulated as drift.

Matching services

See the same work from the platform and delivery angle.

These service pages cover scope, approach, and what an engagement actually delivers.

Frequently asked questions

QWhy not just use Zapier for everything?+
Zapier is excellent for low-volume, simple transformations. It becomes the wrong tool when volume drives cost, when retry semantics matter, or when the transformation logic exceeds what's expressible in the Zapier UI.
QWhat languages and platforms do you build in?+
Node.js, Python, and the serverless platforms: AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions, Cloudflare Workers. We pick based on what the team supporting it can maintain.
QDo we need a developer in-house to maintain custom integrations?+
Not necessarily. Many of our integrations are operated by us under a managed services agreement. If the integration is going to be transferred to an internal team, we factor that into the build choice.
QHow do you handle authentication and secrets?+
Standard practice: secrets in a managed secret store, OAuth flows where supported, credential rotation, and least-privilege scoping. No credentials checked into code.
QCan you replace an existing custom integration?+
Yes. Often the right move when the original is undocumented, not monitored, or the developer who wrote it is gone.
QWhat's the typical cost of a custom integration?+
Highly variable based on the event shape and the destination systems. Initial scoping is fixed; build is project-priced after the scope is clear.
QDo you do webhook receivers?+
Yes: webhook ingestion endpoints with signature verification, queueing, and the downstream processing logic.
QWhat about iPaaS migration to custom?+
Yes. Common pattern when the iPaaS bill has crossed the threshold where a custom integration is cheaper to operate.
Take the next step

Start the conversation.

If something isn't behaving the way it should, that's where we start. Phil reads every inbound personally and responds within one business day.